Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Melanie McElvanney's avatar

It almost doesn’t matter whether Mold and Marzec are in a relationship. Questions of personal ethics in-post will always reflect badly, and perceptions of the motivation for such actions has a knock-on effect on the role both in-county and elsewhere. The appointment of Ms Marzec was clearly inappropriate even as a temporary action, and thankfully enough people questioned it at a level and volume that ensured she resigned. Sadly Mold does not have enough strength of character to do the same. His position is untenable. One can only hope that those who questioned Marzec’s appointment raise their voices again, regarding Mold. You have to wonder what it is about Northampton that seems to regularly attract the people so desperate to have power and position. Why, when their misdeeds (or more charitably, mistakes) are uncovered, do they have to hold on to their position with such a desperate death grip rather than gracefully stepping back? I can at least say I have more appreciation for Ms Marzec’s acceptance of the inevitable.

Expand full comment
Barometer's avatar

I would say to Anita Shields and Zoe McGhee, allowing yourselves to be manipulated into walking out of the meeting was a spectacularly ineffective way of holding Mr Mold to account.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts