Discussion about this post

User's avatar
V Watson's avatar

I think if you look at the money spent on educating children with SEN, it’s a small percentage of the council budget. Supporting children with suitable education isn’t sending councils bust. Under funding and mismanagement of funds is. This is just attention grabbing headline, and sensationalism. Our local authority will buy private properties and land to sell at a loss, but won’t support our most vulnerable young people with an education and they get blamed.

Expand full comment
Maria Botterill's avatar

The situation needs managing.

What we are seeing are schools being nominated the funding but offering a child 1hr a day at reception. Is this legal? Is this discriminatory?

This has a monumantal negative affect on children and families who get into financial straits as they cannot work. Where is the £6000/term funds given for these children? What are Ofsted doing about this?

If a child is nominated a 1:3 ratio instead of a 1:1 there would be results in favour of the child.

Also, the routines need to be nature based and not classroomed with organised outings to local parks daily. This would give these children the wellbeing, calmness and sensory a classroom does not give them.

We had 40 SEND children with only 2 given funding for 1:1 last year. We achieved incredible results with all of these children without funding given. However, after the press were involved we magically got funding for 6 more children in two weeks despite many previous attempts for support.

A solid strategy and not always money is the answer and people in charge of the money that KNOW and CARE enough to not let this carry on a moment longer is what is needed.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts