I watched the YouTube transmission today of Northamptonshire Police, Fire, and Crime panel with some dismay. At the start of the meeting, the Chair said that there was no questions from the public. Why is that? The simple anwers is, the vast majority of Northamptonshire public are sick to death with the carry on of the OPFCC. They are wasting valuable resources and are just plain incompetent. Some of the Councillors have made good points to the Commissioner. However, in some cases it would appear that Stone did not understand the point being made I.e from the former police officer.
The statement about not knowing of the litigation is one that just does not gel with facts.
East Midlands legal services invoices need signing off by someone.
The Chief's witness statements need to be signed by someone, there are monthly risk reviews that the leadership team examine, the press office is aware of litigation that needs press statements.
CCJ exist on the registrar of judgements.
Complaints about unfulfilled SARs and mistreatment of BWV handled by the DPO (who works out of Darby House in the same office as OPFCC) would be handled by the OPFCC.
I fear the statements made today on a formal and very public record will come back to haunt all involved in trying to carry on the cover up.
I watched the YouTube transmission today of Northamptonshire Police, Fire, and Crime panel with some dismay. At the start of the meeting, the Chair said that there was no questions from the public. Why is that? The simple anwers is, the vast majority of Northamptonshire public are sick to death with the carry on of the OPFCC. They are wasting valuable resources and are just plain incompetent. Some of the Councillors have made good points to the Commissioner. However, in some cases it would appear that Stone did not understand the point being made I.e from the former police officer.
The statement about not knowing of the litigation is one that just does not gel with facts.
East Midlands legal services invoices need signing off by someone.
The Chief's witness statements need to be signed by someone, there are monthly risk reviews that the leadership team examine, the press office is aware of litigation that needs press statements.
CCJ exist on the registrar of judgements.
Complaints about unfulfilled SARs and mistreatment of BWV handled by the DPO (who works out of Darby House in the same office as OPFCC) would be handled by the OPFCC.
I fear the statements made today on a formal and very public record will come back to haunt all involved in trying to carry on the cover up.