4 Comments

Lol. This is hilarious. I'm waiting for his response to the question, 'Were you born Nicholas or is that a lie as well? To whom am I speak right now? ' in some caricature of Norman Bates' forensic assessments after Psycho.

Expand full comment

Of course, as per yesterday, he is refusing to be cross-examined, so we aren't going to hear answers to any questions at all, comical or serious.

The question I would like to hear the answer to is "did you write your personal statement to the PFC Panel?". Because if he did, he's burnt toast.

Something that I wasn't aware of until yesterday pm is that the standard of proof in this event is the civil one - balance of probability - not the criminal one - beyond reasonable doubt. So, I rather suspect, he is finished anyway. But it has to be recognised that the matter is a bit more complicated than that. The CPS will, or should, be watching closely, and the defence objective is mainly to deter them from pressing on with later criminal proceedings (with the higher standard of proof) by implying that successful prosecution would be unlikely to be achieved.

Expand full comment

Exactly that, and if he can derail matters as he has tried to do with technicalities then he can avoid justice.

Expand full comment

Hear hear you are spot on sir!

Expand full comment